
When multiple teams write using artificial intelligence, consistency doesn’t happen by itself. Brand voice guidelines become the essential tool to maintain a recognizable brand voice, regardless of the author or the tool used. This guide explains what an AI style guide is, how it differs from an editorial calendar or visual identity, what it should contain, how to adapt it for AI assistants, and how to organize prompts, approvals, and updates. You will find a seven-step method, a brand voice AI prompt generator, and a pre-publication checklist.
At a glance
Brand voice guidelines are the document that sets an organization’s writing rules: who it speaks to, with what voice, in what tone, using what vocabulary, in what formats, and following what style and SEO rules. It serves as a common reference for everyone writing on behalf of the brand—employees, contractors, and now, artificial intelligence tools.
Good brand voice guidelines fit on a few useful pages rather than a massive manual nobody reads. They answer concrete questions: Do we address the reader formally or casually? Do we write “we” or “the company”? Which words do we avoid? How do we format a number or a price? What is the ideal length for an article, a LinkedIn post, or a support reply?
These documents complement each other and are often confused. The table below breaks them down.
| Document | What it answers | Typical content | Users |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand platform | Who are we and why? | Mission, vision, values, promise, personality | Leadership, marketing, agencies |
| Editorial strategy | What do we talk about? | Themes, angles, priority topics, calendar | Marketing, copywriting, PR |
| Brand voice guidelines | How do we write? | Audience, voice, tone, vocabulary, style, formats, SEO rules | Everyone who writes, and AI tools |
| Visual identity | What do we look like? | Logo, colors, typography, layout, images | Designers, developers, agencies |
The brand platform provides the personality, the editorial strategy chooses the topics, and the brand voice guidelines dictate how to write them. Without a brand platform, the guidelines lack foundation; without guidelines, the platform remains just an idea.
To make these principles concrete, let’s take a fictional company: an energy efficiency consulting firm targeting building managers and SMB executives. Here is what the core of their brand voice guidelines might look like on a single page.
| Section | Rule | Do | Don’t |
|---|---|---|---|
| Voice | Expert, factual, reassuring | “Attic insulation typically reduces heat loss by a quarter.” | “A revolutionary solution to save like never before!” |
| Address | Formal, “we” for the firm | “We will provide you with a detailed action plan.” | “You’re going to love our method.” |
| Numbers | Always sourced and dated | “according to the International Energy Agency (2026)” | “thousands of dollars saved” |
| Vocabulary | Industry terms, explained once | “the Energy Performance Certificate (EPC)” | Unexplained acronyms, unnecessary jargon |
| Complaint tone | Professional, empathetic, concrete solution | “You are right, the report arrived late. We are sending it to you today.” | “We apologize for any inconvenience caused.” |
This page takes just a few minutes to read, easily translates into instructions for an AI assistant, and answers the real questions writers have. The rest of the guidelines (formats, SEO rules, approvals) can be added as an appendix.
Notice that the “Don’t” examples aren’t absurd: they are exactly the phrases a rushed writer—or an AI without instructions—would spontaneously produce. That is what makes the document useful daily. A rule no one is tempted to break doesn’t belong here.
Your brand voice is the personality of your writing: direct or nuanced, warm or corporate, technical or educational. It doesn’t change from one channel to another, just as a person’s voice remains recognizable whether they are talking to a friend or a client.
Your brand tone, however, adapts to the situation. You don’t write a welcome message, a complaint response, and a sales pitch the same way. A company with an “expert and accessible” voice will be lighter in a newsletter, more professional and empathetic with an unhappy customer, and highly precise in a technical spec sheet. The guidelines must describe this voice and provide the expected tone for each situation.
Choose three to five personality traits, and specify for each what it means and what it doesn’t mean. “Direct, but never blunt.” “Expert, but without unnecessary jargon.” “Warm, but not overly casual.” This “this, not that” format is highly effective, both for human writers and for an ai brand voice tool.
Before AI, consistency relied on a few writers who knew the brand well. Today, any employee can generate an article, an email, or a product description in seconds. The volume of content is increasing, the number of authors is growing, and everyone uses their own tool with their own prompts.
Without a framework, three issues quickly emerge. The first is a generic style: AI assistants tend to produce bland text full of clichés that sound exactly like your competitors. The second is inconsistency: formal here, casual there, with promises varying from one department to the next. The third is risk: an invented statistic, an unapproved sales promise, or confidential information pasted into a public tool.
Speed makes the problem worse: text written in thirty seconds is also published faster, often without a second glance. What used to take weeks to spread can now scatter across dozens of pages and messages in days. Tone discrepancies are annoying; contradictory promises between the website and the sales team are much worse.
An ai style guide solves all three. It gives tools precise instructions, aligns teams, and sets pre-publication review rules. For a broader look at this topic, read our guide on website editorial governance.

Here are the essential sections. Adapt their length to your organization: an SMB can fit everything into six to ten pages.
Describe your primary readers (executives, buyers, technicians, consumers), what they already know, what they are looking for, and what reassures them. Reiterate the brand promise in one sentence, exactly as it appears in the brand platform.
Personality traits, the choice of formal or casual address, the use of “we,” and the expected tone per situation: prospecting, consulting, complaints, announcements, recruitment.
A list of preferred words (your industry terms, your offer names), words to avoid (internal jargon, superlatives, unnecessary buzzwords), and definitions for ambiguous terms. Indicate how to write product names, acronyms, and partner brands.
Sentence and paragraph length, use of bullet points, capitalization, numbers, dates, pricing (inclusive/exclusive of tax, currency), inclusive writing, citations, and sources. For an international English-speaking audience, specify choices between regional variants (US vs. UK spelling, date formats) and how to handle country-specific differences.
Standard structure for a blog post, a service page, a product description, a newsletter, or a social media post: length, subheadings, call to action, mandatory elements.
Choosing one main keyword per page, title and meta description rules, subheadings, internal links, and image alt texts. These rules prevent keyword cannibalization and ensure mass-produced content remains valuable to Google. Our experts apply these exact rules in our SEO services.
Every channel has its constraints, and the guidelines must specify them without creating endless exceptions. On the website, clarity and SEO are the priority: clear subheadings, direct answers, links to service pages. On LinkedIn, texts are shorter, more personal, and often signed by a team member: the voice stays the same, but the tone becomes more direct. In sales emails, stick to one idea per message, a specific subject line, and a clear ask at the end. In customer support, empathy and accuracy come before everything else: acknowledge the problem, provide the solution, state the timeline.
For each channel, indicate the target length, the level of formality, the acceptable use of emojis, and the signature format. These details prevent case-by-case debates and give AI assistants simple benchmarks to follow.
What is never published without approval: prices, deadlines, guarantees, statistics, legal disclaimers, competitor comparisons, customer testimonials. And what is never done: promising a specific result, inventing an experience, copying third-party text.
Guidelines designed for humans aren’t enough to guide an AI. Assistants follow explicit, short, and illustrated instructions much better than broad principles.
Turn every rule into a verifiable instruction: “average sentence length of 20 words,” “address the reader directly,” “no exclamation marks,” “cite the source and year for every statistic,” “never invent a customer example.” Avoid vague adjectives like “dynamic” or “impactful,” which produce exactly the generic style you want to avoid.
Nothing helps an AI more than an example. For each format, provide one paragraph that perfectly follows the guidelines and one paragraph to avoid, explaining the difference. Two or three well-chosen examples are worth a whole page of rules.
List the phrases that assistants produce spontaneously and that you refuse to use: “In today’s fast-paced world,” “It is important to note that,” “Feel free to,” “In conclusion.” Also, describe an anti-persona: the brand you do not want to be (“an overhyped startup,” “a defensive government agency”). This description sets very clear boundaries.
The tool below compiles a set of instructions based on your choices, ready to be pasted at the beginning of your prompts or into your assistant’s custom instructions. You can then complete it with your own examples and vocabulary.
An ai style guide often takes the form of one prompt template per format. Here is the structure we recommend for a blog post; the brackets should be filled in for each use.
Role: You are a copywriter for [brand name], [one-sentence business description]. Reader: [target audience], who is looking to [need]. Guidelines: [instruction block generated above]. Vocabulary to use: [3 to 5 industry terms]. Words to avoid: [list]. Approved information to use: [facts, sourced numbers, offers, approved prices]. Format: [word count], one H1, H2s formatted as questions, a conclusion, a 4-question FAQ. End with a list of points that require human verification.
The last instruction is the most useful: by asking the assistant to list what it couldn’t verify, you make proofreading easier and reduce the risk of publishing an error.
This method works just as well for an SMB as for a larger organization. Expect it to take a few weeks, progressing through iterations rather than aiming for a perfect document on the first try.
Guidelines are only useful if they are applied. With AI, governance comes down to three elements: shared templates, clear roles, and an approval workflow proportionate to the risks.
Write a prompt template for each common format: blog post, service page, product description, sales email, support reply. Each template should include the core guideline instructions, specify the expected format, and leave blank fields (topic, audience, approved information to use). Store them in a shared workspace and, if possible, integrate them directly into your tools (custom instructions, team assistants, prompt libraries).
An editorial manager owns the guidelines and makes calls on difficult cases. Each team designates a point person who enforces the rules and reports back on new needs. Authors—whether human or assisted by AI—remain responsible for what they publish.
Not all content requires the same level of scrutiny. An internal news post can be reviewed by its author; a service page, a sales offer, or an article citing statistics must be reviewed by a second pair of eyes; a legal disclaimer or a price must be approved by the responsible person. Keep track of recurring errors: they highlight rules that need clarification in the guidelines or the prompts.
Once a quarter, take about ten pieces of content published by different teams and run them through the pre-publication checklist below. Track the compliance rate, the most frequently broken rules, and the most problematic formats. You can also ask an AI assistant to check a text against the guidelines, provided a human validates its feedback: the tool is great at spotting tone inconsistencies or banned phrases, but much less reliable at catching reckless promises or false statistics.
| Step | Traditional process | AI-assisted process, with guidelines |
|---|---|---|
| Brief | Verbal exchange or freeform email | Shared prompt template with approved info |
| First draft | Copywriter, several hours | AI guided by brand rules, a few minutes |
| Review | Spelling and style | Facts, numbers, tone, promises, SEO, sensitive data |
| Approval | Communications manager | Based on the content’s risk level |
| Improvement | Rare and informal | Recurring errors added to guidelines and prompts |

Our SEO experts review and optimize your copy
Google does not penalize content simply because it was written with AI: it evaluates its usefulness, originality, and reliability, regardless of how it was produced. However, using tools to mass-generate low-value pages to manipulate rankings violates its spam policies (Google Search Central).
Therefore, brand voice guidelines also protect your SEO. They enforce one main keyword per page and prevent multiple teams from publishing competing content on the same topic. They require examples, sourced statistics, and an identified author, which strengthens experience and reliability signals. Finally, they establish a clear structure, with subheadings and direct answers, which both Google and AI search engines know how to leverage.
A consistent voice also helps AI assistants understand your brand: identical descriptions of your services across all your pages reinforce your entity. This is one of the key tactics detailed in our guide on how to be visible on ChatGPT and Gemini.
Your brand voice guidelines are the perfect place to document AI safety rules.
In the European Union, Article 50 of the AI Act applies from August 2, 2026. It requires disclosing text generated or manipulated by AI when published to inform the public on matters of public interest, unless it has undergone genuine human review and a person assumes editorial responsibility (European Commission). A simple spell-check does not constitute this level of control. For standard marketing content, there is no general obligation to add an “AI-generated” label, but documented human review remains the best practice. In the US, the UK, and Canada, regulations and FTC guidelines differ: always verify the legal framework applicable to your publications.
Forbid pasting customer data, contracts, internal financials, or personally identifiable information (PII) into public AI tools. Prioritize enterprise versions of AI assistants, whose terms exclude using your data for training, and remind your team of GDPR, CCPA, or other relevant privacy laws. Write down clearly what can and cannot be shared with an AI tool.
An AI can reproduce phrasing similar to existing texts. Instruct teams never to publish a text they haven’t reviewed and rewritten, to verify quotes, and to avoid prompting the AI to imitate the style of an identifiable author or brand.
This list can be printed or integrated into your content management system.
A sixty-page document will neither be read nor applied. Keep the essentials, illustrate them with examples, and link to appendices for the details.
“Dynamic and professional tone” means nothing to a writer, and even less to an AI. Every rule must be illustrated.
Your offerings, audiences, and tools evolve. Guidelines that haven’t been reviewed in three years describe a company that no longer exists. Schedule regular updates and date every version.
If everyone keeps their own instructions in their tool, consistency vanishes. Prompt templates must be shared, version-controlled, and updated alongside the guidelines.
A brand operating internationally must adapt its guidelines for each language, not just translate them. Politeness levels, humor, and cultural references change. Our article on website translation with AI details these precautions.
AI doesn’t make brand voice guidelines obsolete: it makes them indispensable. When any employee can generate text in seconds, only a shared reference—translated into precise instructions and backed by examples—can maintain a recognizable brand voice. The rest comes down to straightforward governance: shared prompt templates, clear roles, human review proportionate to the risks, and regular updates.
Our advice: start small. One page on voice and tone, a list of words to avoid, three examples per format, and a block of AI instructions are enough to see a difference in just a few weeks. If your brand is undergoing a major shift, our article on brand and website redesign will help you tackle both projects together.
Brand voice guidelines are the document that establishes an organization’s writing rules: target audience, voice and tone, vocabulary, style rules, formats, and SEO guidelines. It serves as a reference for everyone writing on behalf of the brand, and now for AI tools, to keep content consistent across all channels.
They should describe the target audience and promise, the voice and tone for different situations, the vocabulary to use and avoid, style and typography rules, templates for key formats, SEO rules, and what requires approval before publication. Every rule benefits from being illustrated with a “Do” and a “Don’t” example.
An editorial strategy defines what the brand talks about: themes, angles, priority topics, and the content calendar. Brand voice guidelines define how the brand talks about them: voice, tone, vocabulary, style, and formats. Both are complementary and stem from the brand platform, which establishes the mission, values, and personality.
A brand voice is the personality of a company’s writing: direct or nuanced, warm or corporate, technical or educational. It remains stable across all channels. The tone, however, adapts to the situation—lighter in a newsletter, more professional when handling a complaint—without changing the brand’s core personality.
Translate the guidelines into precise instructions, complete with dos and don’ts, and integrate them into prompt templates shared across all teams. Add a human review process proportionate to the risks and update the guidelines with any recurring errors. Without shared templates, every tool will eventually impose its own style.
No, not inherently. Google evaluates the usefulness, originality, and reliability of content, regardless of how it was produced. However, mass-generating low-value pages to manipulate rankings violates its spam policies. Brand voice guidelines and human review help ensure you stay on the right side of these rules.
EXCELLENT Based on 22 reviews Posted on Google pierre lenfantTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Aurone is a web agency like no other! Very responsive, highly flexible in the way they work and always at the cutting edge of technology: you can count on real professionals for all your web projects!Posted on Google Sami Yassine TurkiTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. As Secretary General of the Lina Ben Mhenni association, it was a pleasure to work with the AURONE agency, which developed our website with great professionalism.Posted on Google Gwladys LavergneTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Responsive, attentive and highly skilled: we are delighted to work with Aurone, who meet our expectations perfectly, both in graphic design and in technical expertise. I highly recommend their support!Posted on Google Perrine AmalTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Aurone is a human, responsive and efficient company. The work was done quickly and promptly. I highly recommend them and hope to continue this collaboration in the future.Posted on Google Stephanie WillmanTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. We have been working with Aurone since 2016 and are delighted. We first called on their services for a project in Tunisia, and the quality of their work means we now rely on Aurone for services in other countries too. The team is dynamic, creative, responsive and enthusiastic. They have always understood our needs for our diverse and complex web presences, and do their best to meet them. Web platforms, training workshops on the platforms, video tutorials and graphic design for various products are just some of the excellent services Aurone provides. The technical quality of their web services is top-notch, and we always get good advice, both technical and creative. We highly recommend them.Posted on Google Raphaël GianassoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. For your e-commerce and digital marketing projects, the Aurone team is attentive, experienced, available and responsive. A team you can count on, for whom customer satisfaction comes first.Posted on Google Samuel DechometsTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. At Aurone I found everything you can expect from a good web agency: quality, responsiveness, flexibility, relevance... Well done and thank you!Posted on Google Karim DjebbarTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Our whole network worked with the Aurone agency for several years. A few adjustments were needed at the start of our partnership back then, but quality quickly followed.
The teams worked very professionally, adapting to the requirements of the French clients we soon put them in touch with.
A great deal of agility from its founder.
Thank you for these great years!
27 Avenue Taieb Mhiri, Immeuble Yasmina
2080 Ariana, Tunis, Tunisia
Made with in Tunis | Copyright © 2007-2026 Aurone | Legal notice | Privacy policy